Typically the most popular bills () are the Infidelity Difficulties Survey (IDQ; Buss ainsi que al

Typically the most popular bills () are the Infidelity Difficulties Survey (IDQ; Buss ainsi que al

With regards to aspect out of intimate jealousy, on the forty thinking-statement products was indeed said because production of brand new Worry about-Statement and you will Projective Jealousy Bills (Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979). Of several tools were used only once. , 1992) intended to assess sex differences; new Multidimensional Envy Measure (Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989) created to gauge the about three proportions of envy (cognitive flingster Log in, emotional and you may behavioural proportions); the fresh new Facebook Jealousy Size (Muise, Christofides, & Des) geared towards contrasting the possibilities of an event that triggers emotions out-of jealousy people regarding the pastime into the Myspace; the newest Envy Size (Buunk, 1997), always have a look at around three particular jealousy (reactive, nervous and you will preventive) additionally the Social Jealousy Measure (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981), and that evaluates the bad feeling through actual or threatened losings away from a loved person to an opponent.

When you look at the Brazil, the fresh Romantic Envy Directory was revised (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) In terms of Colombia, there aren’t any psychometric studies out-of a particular size into the romantic envy

Regarding Latin american perspective, there clearly was a version inside the Chile of one’s List regarding Practices of the Partners That cause Envy (Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014). Within the Mexico, a Multidimensional Measure of Jealousy (Diaz-Enjoying, Rivera, & Flores, 1989) has been elaborated and you can a short study try through with the fresh Multidimensional Catalog out-of Close Envy (Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016). Additionally, earlier education failed to would Factorial Confirmatory Research (CFA) in order to validate this new grounds structure discovered, and you can lowest precision profile was found in the factors (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) otherwise short samples were utilized (Mota mais aussi al., 2016).

This new IJS arranged for Mathes and you may Severa (1981) the most utilized bills getting contrasting intimate jealousy, they discovered half dozen activities that measure the susceptibility to help you dangers associated to: (a) Lover’s cheating and matchmaking anyone else (points step 1, 3, 12, fourteen, fifteen, 16, 20, twenty two, 23, and you will twenty five); (b) Partner’s popularity (situations dos, step three, 4, seven, ten, 13, 17, 20, and 23); (c) An enthusiastic untrustworthy mate (circumstances step one, cuatro, 6, 19, and you may 21); (d) Lover’s dated schedules (circumstances eleven, twenty-four, twenty-six, twenty-seven, and you will twenty eight); (e) Partner’s indifference (products 8, 9 and you may 24); and you may (f) Lover’s remaining family that have dated schedules and you may intercourse distinctions (activities 5 and you will 18).

Most of the tool in the above list show adequate levels of legitimacy and precision

You can find five training having examined in terms of their reliability and you may authenticity. Mathes and you may Severa (1981) expose a couple education, additionally the earliest research did the development of the scale that have 39 products, that has been quicker to twenty eight situations immediately after statistical study. Next, into the another investigation, IJS was utilized alongside other scales you to definitely examined romantic like-links, low self-esteem, self-esteem and you may an ad hoc survey off independent identities, verifying, predicated on principle, the sophisticated of jealousy, the better the level of Romantic like and reduced the newest separate term of couples. In this investigation, we report a good coefficient from accuracy from .92 to your total size. Within the a third analysis, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and Manhood (1982), so you can offer the signs from validity, used the IJS as well as 2 behavioral actions: (a) threat when exposed to an opponent and you can (b) expressions from possessiveness towards spouse, as a consequence of a telephone call that they designed to the person who participated in the analysis. The brand new asked correlations was basically received, and therefore once more offered the latest authenticity of your scale. Fundamentally, when you look at the a fourth studies, Mathes, Roter and you can Joerger (1982) corroborated the new convergent validity regarding IJS along with other bills that evaluated romantic envy.

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *